Hey guys…today my religion teacher made a statement that was rather disturbing. He said that in the book of Genesis, when it says God created man in his own image, it actually means God created a PERSON in his own image. He says the word ‘man’ actually comes from the Hebrew word for ‘person’. So, my religion teacher concluded that we’re not certain if Adam was a man. This is rather bizarre. If Adam was not a man, what was he? He couldn’t have been a woman, otherwise, how would he and Eve have made Cain and Abel? Not only that, but there are MANY other accounts in the bible where ppl were called “man” and we know FOR SURE that they are males.
I don’t know…i was going to discuss this with my teacher but we were running out of class time….can any of you please explain this ‘hypothesis’ to me…its not credible
Thanks for your time guys, GB++
Comments
I am not sure what exactly the point your teacher wanna say ..
but....adam was a man and he got his wief and his kids cain and
habile....he felt in sin he died like any body else....
and do not forget god gave an order to adam to increase the
people in all the earth (execuse my spiling)
that's mean it's one nation....
God bless
teacher's religon? ;)
May God help them to see the Truth
Pete
I love comparative religions and even Scholarly Biblical Study and have taken many courses in both areas in university. But I'm blessed with this strange ability to just approach that stuff as interest and not spiritual education.
Good luck and God Bless
- let me gues, does he teach science aswel??? lol cus if he does wel dats wer his getin his ideas from
if bishop agrees, take it to the higher level... if it is not a christian school... take it to you political leader, because that does not belong in class.
If you accept all the books of the Bible as canonical, then are you not contradicting yourself by accepting this decision of the Church, and then turn around and reject the Church's stance on the verses in question?
Your teacher's political correctness must break down at some point, because what was this person? Genderless? And if genderless, then at some point, children must be given birth who do have gender, and then will your teacher find offense at the fact that these children have gender?......what a laugh.