Me and my math teacher from the past are both having a problem about speaking in tounges. He is a penticostal Christian or something like that. And he tells me that saint Paul said to us that we can speak in tounges. He gave me the verses: 1 Corinthians 14:5 12:10 14:18. These basically say that saint Paul wanted us to speak in tounges and all that. How can I prove to him or support the fact that saint paul did not mean that and that he means something else, or what can I give him to change his mind about it and understand what I am saying. I am Coptic orthodox and I'm pretty sure that Abouna does not speak in tounges.
Forgive me if I ask to much, but can you please write your answers in a form so that I can show him directly and have him read it. Thank you
Pray for me, and all those in Egypt. Including our Muslim brothers and sisters
Comments
1 Cor. 14:9,19,23 and 2 Tim 2:16 all speak against incoherant babbling in the church. The major problem with these peoples belief is they do not understand the historical context. Speaking in tongues is not babbling, the people are HEARING in their own language, as the scripture says. It is not to reinforce any belief or prophecy or anything like that. It was a means of spreading the gospel in a region with 14 different languages, enabling to spread rapidly, like it did.
Lol, he gave you 1 Corinth. 14 : 5. If you keep reading that chapter you will get to verse 26. Keep reading on from 26 till the end. The answer is clear and needs no explaining.
Also geomike. Therefore if the whole church comes together in one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those who are uninformed or unbelievers, will they not say that you are out of your mind? 1 Corinth. 14:23-25 support their belief that speaking in tounges is correct.
We do not need to trade scriptures because trading scriptures is not Orthodox, not Christian.
We begin always and only with what the Church has always taught. And the Church has never taught this practice of speaking in tongues. This means that Pentecostalists are misunderstanding and misrepresenting the Bible.
Can they show where any of these modern practices have ever had a place in the history of the Orthodox Church? They cannot. Therefore these practices are not Christian. This is without investigating the practices themselves which would even more clearly show that they are not Christian.
The question you should ask is why should you accept his modern interpretation of the Bible, which is unsupported by the history of the Church, instead of the interpretation which all Christians have always accepted?
Father Peter
I am unable to help you my friend, I fear I would only be enabling an argument that has no value. I apologize.
[quote author=geomike link=topic=10356.msg126129#msg126129 date=1294068163]
Lol, he gave you 1 Corinth. 14 : 5. If you keep reading that chapter you will get to verse 26. Keep reading on from 26 till the end. The answer is clear and needs no explaining.
Also geomike. Therefore if the whole church comes together in one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those who are uninformed or unbelievers, will they not say that you are out of your mind? 1 Corinth. 14:23-25 support their belief that speaking in tounges is correct.
If you read 26 and on, it will say that if anyone speaks in a tongue but there is no interpreter then that person must bequiet.
The purpose of speaking in tongues is to either preach and others may hear it in their language (What happened in Pentecost), or were one speaks in tongues and another, who speaks the language of the people, interprets. Other than those cases there is the case where the spirit prays in tongues, but the person him/herself doesn't understand. In those cases one should stay silent and heed the words of St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 14:14-19:
For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my understanding is unfruitful. What is the conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will also pray with the understanding. I will sing with the spirit, and I will also sing with the understanding. Otherwise, if you bless with the spirit, how will he who occupies the place of the uninformed say “Amen” at your giving of thanks, since he does not understand what you say? For you indeed give thanks well, but the other is not edified. I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all; yet in the church I would rather speak five words with my understanding, that I may teach others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue.
So there is very little point to tongues in a church where all speak the same language anyway, and can all communicate without speaking in tongues. Remember the devil who could turn rods into snakes in Exodus, imitating the miracle performed by God through Aaron, can imitate that which can be used by God into deception. Because the speaking in tongues used in those churches, doesn't fall under any of the categories mentioned by St. Paul, I'd say that it is a work of the devil.
I think the best thing to do right now, is to read the section on speaking in tongues in H.H.'s book.