Hi,
You know we have 7 Sacraments of the Church:
1) Baptism
2) Confirmation
3) Confession
4) Communion
5) Marriage
6) Priesthood
7) Annointing of the Sick
My question is this: When someone becomes a Monk, this is not a sacrament (apparently, priesthood is different from monk-hood); yet a monk can become a bishop and a bishop can become and archbishop, and an archbishop (and i think a monk and above can become a pope).
But why then isn't monkhood a sacrament? Its as if the priest receives the grace of the Holy Spirit to become a Priest, yet a monk doesnt get that and he ends up as an archbishop?
Wouldn't that mean that a priest is higher than a monk AND a bishop?
So, why is the priesthood a sacrament and yet ordaining someone a monk is not a sacrament?? Surely a monk can also perform the same functions as a priest?
Comments
pray for me +
*1 Every sacrement requires the dwelling of the holy spirit.
*2 Monks can become bishops but need to take the sacrement of priesthood. Monks without priesthood can't pray in the liturgy.
1. Priests
A. Priest
B. Hegomens
2. Bishops
A. Bishops
B. Metropolitans
3. Pope
Technically the pope is still part of the bishopric but i consider him a rank of his own because of my high adoration for HH even though he really does belong to the bishopric since he is the head of the bishops (ra3ees el asakefa) sorry if you can't read my arabic to well
but the bishop is ordained by the pope
If i'm not mistaking a bisschop is ordained by the laying hands of (at least) 3 bisschops, and they can be any 3 bisschops - normally one of them is the pope. I'm not 100% positive, so if I'm wrong let me know ;)
2) Confirmation
Is confirmation the myron?????
Yes, but the correct term is confirmation
Only in the Catholic and Protestant churches, where this sacrament is performed at around 12-14 years of age as a way for the now adult to confirm the baptism they received as an infant.
In the Orthodox Church it is generally referred to as Chrismation.
The term Confirmation, however valid it may be, does not give that sense and as Orthodox11 pointed out, since they get Confirmed at a later age, it is more a "Confirmation" that they will indeed follow Christ. There are many Charismatics who believe in a "second baptism" because they do not understand that the receiving of Gifts were at Confirmation, and how the Church often in those times had Baptism and Confirmation done simultaneously (though I must stress that as much as they intrinsically linked, they are two Separate Mysteries).
I am biased, but I just like our Terminology. I think "Confirmation", as much as this may be semantics, it is a term that I think is inadequate, especially in our practices and we should stick with tradition. :)