@tenooshy Maybe I'm reading something you're not, but there is strong evidence for gene "Xq28" being a genetic marker. This gene has been studied since 1980, and multiple subsequent studies up until a few years ago have consistently presented strong…
@tenoosht I don't understand Arabic, so I couldn't watch the first video. The second video doesn't really talk about treatment.
You and I aren't both experts in the field, but what seems to provide stronger evidence: the plethora of studies in the s…
@BeeKay, Back to your point about the Church not endorsing the genetic basis of homosexuality due to not having the "theological/scientific fortitude" :
I understand this reasoning, but I just think it ultimately hurts the Church's members who may h…
I think you guys are missing my point. I'm not arguing whether or not homosexuality is a sin; I'm arguing that there is evidence for the genetic predisposition to homosexual orientation. There are Christians who are homosexual that don't engage in s…
Fair enough, we can agree to disagree. However, even if the evidence is still in its early stages, the evidence still suggests a potential genetic link for homosexuality, so why is there such quick judgment to totally dismiss scientific evidence? Sh…
1-- Fixed link: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/261/5119/321
2-- "people on earth decide by their own will to break actual man-made laws"-- yes, I agree, but that doesn't mean one doesn't have the predisposition to breaking man-made laws, such…